Arthritis Forum

Full Version: The Pros and Cons of Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement Surgery
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pros of Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement Surgery:

  1. Smaller incisions: The surgery uses smaller incisions, which results in less scarring and a quicker healing process.
  2. Shorter hospital stay: Minimally invasive knee replacement surgery typically requires a shorter hospital stay, and patients are able to return home sooner.
  3. Less pain and swelling: The smaller incisions and less muscle disruption can result in less pain and swelling compared to traditional knee replacement surgery.
  4. Faster recovery: Patients typically experience a faster recovery and are able to return to normal activities sooner.

Cons of Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement Surgery:

  1. Limited accessibility: The smaller incisions limit the surgeon's access to the knee joint, which can make it difficult to perform the surgery on patients with more complex medical conditions.
  2. Higher cost: Minimally invasive knee replacement surgery is often more expensive than traditional knee replacement surgery.
  3. Not suitable for all patients: The procedure may not be suitable for all patients, particularly those with severe knee damage or deformity.
  4. Skill and experience: Minimally invasive knee replacement surgery requires a higher level of skill and experience from the surgeon, which may not be available at all hospitals.